List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to AJP

Article

Volume 37 • Number 1

Spring 2003



 

Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and the Aesthetically Sublime

 

by Bart Vandenabeele

Much has been written on the relationship between Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche. Much remains to be said, however, concerning their respective theories of the sublime. First, I shall argue against the traditional, dialectical view of Schopenhauer's theory of the sublime that stresses the crucial role the sublime plays in bridging the wide gap between aesthetics and ethics. Although this traditional interpretation is definitely influenced by Nietzsche, I do not maintain it is exclusively Nietzschean as such. Second, I would like to offer some points of contention concerning their accounts of the feeling of the sublime. I will try and show that, although Nietzsche's account of the Apollonian and the Dionysian is highly influenced by Schopenhauer's analysis of the sublime feeling, his analysis of Dionysian intoxication cannot be taken to simply develop out of Schopenhauer's philosophy. Moreover, by way of (a not so innocent) example, it is shown that Nietzsche's philosophy of music — although highly influenced by Schopenhauer's —cannot as easily be reconciled with Schopenhauer's theory as is commonly believed, due to their differing accounts of the nature of the feeling of the sublime.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in The Journal of Aesthetic Education is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the The Journal of Aesthetic Education database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.


Terms and Conditions of Use